We aim to provide documents in an accessible format. If you're having problems using a document with your accessibility tools, please contact us for help.
This paper found that option 4 – quantify added sugars in the Nutrition Information Panel (NIP) – had the greatest potential. This is because it:
- best meets the desired outcome
- provides a net benefit.
Costs related to option 4 are minimised because the NIP is already part of the food label.
This paper also found that applying option 6 – a pictorial approach – to sugary or sugar-sweetened beverages was worth considering.
This paper draws on the feedback from the consultation on the labelling of sugars on packaged foods and drinks.